Choose your options based on what makes sense for how many users you have. I also add a $10/mo 100gb block of storage space for syncing the contents of my phone. They make this easy with a Docker Droplet ready to go:įor my single-user purposes, the lowest $5/mo tier is enough. So I have chosen to deploy this as a virtual private server with Digital Ocean. This is what I do, because my internet connection is pretty limited and I need to share large files. Check it out! ON A VIRTUAL PRIVATE SERVER Using the cheap Pi hardware, you can get NextCloud up without much hassle and without any technical knowledge. It is the most consumer-ready of options if you are not a technical user. NextCloudPi is an operating system designed for the Raspberry Pi platform. Evernote/iOS Notes – Nextcloud Notes apps.iCloud/Google – Calendars, Todos, Contacts via CalDAV.Dropbox – File syncing and sharing via WebDAV.My NextCloud server replaces these cloud services with it’s NextCloud equivalent: I also have multiple work and personal computers, some OS X and some Linux, and also use both iOS and Android devices. I own a small business and my entire life is dictated by my todo list and calendar. All synchronized across all my devices on all platforms. Using the open source NextCloud software, I have deployed a private server that replaces all the common uses of cloud services: calendar, todo lists, files, passwords, bookmarks, contacts, and notes. Just look at China’s “ social credit” system. While there is nothing particularly salacious in my calendar appointments or phone notes app, there is also no guarantee that future uses of this data by future technologies will be so benign. As they say, the internet is forever, and it’s become clear that once your information is out there all kinds of third parties may have access to it. Part of being happier with my technology was just as much realizing what I didn’t want as it was realizing what I wanted.With all the revelations in the headlines about how exactly our private data is being mined to surveil and manipulate us, I’ve been thinking of more ways to take better control of my information. I’m sure Synology has a full suite as well, but it’s not what I want out of my NAS. You could probably get something similar with ownCloud which I did try running, and I’m not even particularly enticed. Syncthing won’t give you directory sync, docs integration, or granular ACLs.īut that’s actually perfectly fine, because I don’t need any of those things. Not to mention you probably use Google Docs or Office 365 anyways, both of which are integrated with their respective company’s storage offerings. Syncthing is great for a single person or even a fairly large group of people, but not for a big organization. I do use Google Drive at work and for that type of use case I would not argue in favor of self-hosting. That said, I totally get why it’s still important. Not only do I not want Google Drive, I don’t even want anything like it. I don’t use Dropbox OR Google Drive, I use Syncthing, which can do stuff that neither of those could ever dream of in terms of syncing between machines. These days I greatly prefer to own my data more directly, which I accomplish using a NAS. Times have changed in many more ways than one. A lot of popular open source "not evil" software use that model, for example, IIRC, Firefox has always stored bookmarks in an opaque sqlite database while Internet Explorer stored them as files in a folder, and I don't think I need to tell you which one is considered the most evil. But there are also some advantages such as being able to do versioning, syncing, collaborative work, searching and general database-like operations when your filesystem doesn't support it. I disapprove of the "new" way (that is not so new, but it is the current trend) because it favors lock-in and general loss of control. Now the trend is to first open the app and then use the app to fetch your data, that data is entirely managed by the app and may be stored in an opaque area of a filesystem, some server on the internet, etc. On Windows, you double-click on the file, on a command line, you type "app filename". There is a transition from a file-centric to an app-centric model, that I mostly disapprove of, but that's what is happening.īefore, you had files stored in a filesystem, you picked the file and opened it with the app.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |